TORONTO – A court in Toronto is hearing for a second day why Canada’s system of solitary confinement for inmates is unconstitutional.
Civil liberties lawyers say administrative segregation, among other things, is procedurally unfair and structurally deficient.
They say no meaningful review exists of a warden’s decision to place someone in isolation.
Get breaking National news
READ MORE: Canada’s inmate segregation laws face Constitutional challenge in court
Inmates in administrative segregation are locked away by themselves for 23 hours a day.
It is used when prisoners are at risk from other inmates, or pose a threat to the security of the prison.
- Applicants for child care operator licences in Saskatchewan say they’re being denied
- More than $500M likely required annually for Calgary to meet affordable housing targets
- First-ever Saskatchewan commodity showcase connects producers with global buyers
- Montreal-area family hopes daughter’s cancer journey inspires blood donors
-
![]()
Cyclospora outbreak source not confirmed, health officials investigating link to lettuce, greens -
![]()
CN rail train drives through inferno as wildfires ravage northwestern Ontario -
![]()
WestJet flight attendants vote in favour of strike -
![]()
Immigration lawyer reacts as some “Lost Canadians” told to return citizenship certificate
READ MORE: Federal government wants Ontario inmate segregation fight put on ice
Research, however, suggests the practice can cause extreme psychological harm, especially when prolonged.
Liberties groups and prisoner activists want a 15-day limit placed on such isolation.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.