A lawyer representing British Columbia says proposed changes to an environmental law won’t allow the province to refuse to provide a permit to a pipeline operator for no reason.
B.C.’s Court of Appeal is hearing a reference case that asks whether the province can create a permitting system for transporters of hazardous substances through its territory.
READ MORE: B.C. argues it cannot stop Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, but it can protect environment
The governments of Canada, Alberta and Saskatchewan say Ottawa – not provinces – has jurisdiction over inter-provincial projects such as the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.
Get breaking National news
WATCH: B.C. bid to control Trans Mountain shipments
- Chinese EV issue part of U.S. trade talks, Mexico foreign secretary says
- Vancouver working to avoid ‘the great sigh’ following FIFA World Cup excitement
- Port of Vancouver expansion project referred to Canada’s Major Projects Office
- Close to 800,000 have applied for $100 rebate, payments coming: Alberta’s Smith
Canada says in court documents that the proposed amendments to B.C.’s Environmental Management Act must be struck down because they give the province a “veto” over such projects.
READ MORE: B.C. Court of Appeal to hear province’s challenge of Trans Mountain pipeline expansion Monday
Joseph Arvay, a lawyer for B.C., says the amendments only allow the province to refuse to issue a permit or revoke one in cases where the operator fails to follow conditions imposed upon it.
He adds that if the operator finds the conditions too onerous, it can appeal to the independent Environmental Appeal Board, or in the case of Trans Mountain, the National Energy Board.
Comments
Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.