A Canadian court has ordered the government of Iran to pay $200 million to a British Columbia mechanic who was branded an ‘infidel’ and tortured for criticizing the Islamic regime.
In a decision obtained by Global News, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded $100 million in compensation and another $100 million in punitive damages to Zahed Haftlang.
The court said Haftlang, an Iranian refugee who fled to Canada in 2001, merited the unusually large sum because of the “years of mistreatment” and “lifetime of mental trauma” he suffered.
Justice Lee Akazaki wrote that while a single judgment might not deter Iran’s abuses, the “accumulation of damage awards, often executed against Iran’s frozen foreign assets, has some effect.”
Although foreign governments are generally immune from Canada’s civil courts, Justice Akazaki ruled that Iran’s torture of Haftlang was motivated by the regime’s politics, religion and ideology.
As a result, it amounted to “terrorist activity” akin to staging attacks on foreign soil intended to silence opposition to the regime, so Iran did not benefit from state immunity, the judge ruled.
“Iran is therefore liable to Mr. Haftlang and answerable to a civil judgment by this court for his loss caused by the acts committed against him,” according to the 13-page decision handed down on May 29.
The decision is the latest against Iran by a Canadian court under the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, which allows those impacted by terrorism to sue state sponsors of the groups that harmed them.
It marked the first time a court in Canada had found that terrorist activity included Iran’s atrocities against its own citizens, and could potentially open the door for many more such lawsuits.
Haftlang’s lawyer, Mark Arnold, said it may be the largest sum ever awarded to an individual in Canada. The Ontario court earlier awarded $100 million in damages to the estates of six passengers killed when the regime shot down Ukraine Airlines flight 752 on Jan. 8, 2020.
The decision stems from abuses committed in the 1990s, but the regime has continued to mistreat opponents, most recently in January with the mass killing of anti-regime demonstrators.
While the U.S. and Israeli war against Iran in February initially raised hopes of regime change, that seems unlikely as U.S. President Donald Trump struggles to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Get breaking National news
Haftlang is now a Canadian citizen and works as an auto mechanic in North Vancouver, B.C. But before he resettled in Canada 25 years ago, he was recruited into the Iranian military at age 13.
At the time he enlisted as a child soldier, in 1981, Iran was at war with neighbouring Iraq. Haftlang was captured by Iraqi forces and held prisoner until the conflict ended, at which point he was sent home.
But Iranian authorities viewed him with suspicion, according to the court decision. At his debriefing, he criticized the Iranian regime, prompting authorities to call him an infidel and send him to prison.
During the two years he was held captive, Iranian police and prison guards beat him, attached objects to his genitals, electrocuted him and left him with head trauma, the court said.
Released in 1993, he went to work on government-operated cargo ships, where he got into arguments with those the judge described as “ideologically adherent crew members.”
Aboard the ship Iran Mazandaran, he insulted Iran’s Supreme Leader. Fearing the captain would report him, he jumped ship in Vancouver’s English Bay, and a kayaker helped him to shore.
Now married with two children, he sued the Iranian government in 2024 with the help of Arnold, a Toronto lawyer with a long record of successful civil court actions against the Islamic Republic.
- Montreal public health warns of overdose spike as naloxone use reaches last year’s total
- Saskatchewan boosts disaster aid in response to storm-packed spring and summer
- World champion curler, long-time broadcaster Don Duguid dies at 90
- Corus to centralize Calgary, Edmonton news production, some jobs cut
Before the court could rule on the case, it first had to decide whether Iran was immune from civil actions. Under the Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act, Iran can’t claim immunity for acts of terrorism.
Justice Akazaki found that Iran’s torture of Haftlang amounted to terrorism because it arose from the decision that “he was an infidel worthy of control and isolation from Iranian society.”
The “revolutionary arm” of the Iranian regime that is controlled by the Supreme Leader and his Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps was responsible for Haftlang’s detention, the judge ruled.
“I also conclude that these revolutionary actors were driven by their suspicion of the returned prisoner of war because of his vocal dissent and the length of detention in the military prisons of Iraq,” the judge wrote.
“They branded him an ‘infidel’ and tortured him to condition him into loyalty to the Supreme Leader,” according to the decision, which said he was tortured “to suppress any misgivings he may have harboured about his participation as an Iranian soldier.”
“He was an ordinary person upset by the Iran to which he returned and was caught up in a paranoid regime’s cogs,” wrote the judge, who said what Haftlang endured was “no less an act of state terror than firing an ordnance into a residential area.”
By passing legislation lifting Iran’s immunity, Canada had “joined the chorus of nations requiring Iran to stop the use of violence and the threat of violence toward civilians as an instrument of foreign and domestic policy,” the judge added.
In addition to the $200 million, the court awarded a further $100,000 to Haftlang’s wife and $50,000 to his daughter for the “loss of guidance, care and companionship” caused by the regime’s actions.
Canada severed diplomatic relations with Iran in 2012 and added Tehran to its list of state sponsors of terrorism. Since then, terror victims have won several judgments against Iran in the Canadian courts.
To compensate them, Iran’s non-diplomatic assets in Canadian cities were sold off. The government views Tehran’s diplomatic properties, such as its Ottawa embassy building, as untouchable, but victims are seeking to change that through the courts.
Iranian officials have expressed outrage over the loss of their Canadian properties and bank accounts, accusing Ottawa of “economic terrorism.” They have also threatened to seize Canadian ships in retaliation.
Stewart.Bell@globalnews.ca
Not withstanding all the horrible things done to this guy, no one is worth a hundred million dollars. Very much a showboat ruling by this judge. On a positive note, it does show to people the real Iran.
What a waste of the courts time. Iran will just laugh at the judgement.
Iran is a cesspit with weak institutions and an even weaker political order, why would they take it upon themselves to torture people for what they deem immorality? Get your priorities s
this guy gets 200m but victims being butchered by Canadian terrorist doctors due to Malpractice have virtually full immunity and no accountability..Canada is as corrupt as Iran and just as evil.
All the people who mocked this judgment because they think Iran won’t pay up obviously didn’t read the whole article.
“Canada severed diplomatic relations with Iran in 2012 and added Tehran to its list of state sponsors of terrorism. Since then, terror victims have won several judgments against Iran in the Canadian courts.
To compensate them, Iran’s non-diplomatic assets in Canadian cities were sold off. The government views Tehran’s diplomatic properties, such as its Ottawa embassy building, as untouchable, but victims are seeking to change that through the courts.”
Iran has no choice.
Now it’s time to declare Israel a state sponsor of terrorism so tortured Palestinians who escape to Canada can sue them.
Like that’s going to happen. Who is going to enforce it?
Taxpayers on the hook for court costs as court makes pointless and meaningless gesture.
Justice Akazaki should be removed from sitting on the bench period!
No worries Carney will fit the bill with tax payers money! Elbowzos up. I suspect Iran is cutting the check as we speak.
What a ridiculous ruling. Even thinking Iran wouldn’t laugh at the order shows a serious level of mental detachment from reality. Iran is hard Islamic and Muslim, they bow to no one.
Yeah good luck on collecting the money for the joke no jurisdiction
While the treatment the person in the story suffered if atrocious, it’s not terrorism. Terrorism is defined as acts meant to instill terror in the masses, not a single person. Otherwise every jail in the country should be shut down for terrorism, the treatment in those institutions is atrocious. If this was enforceable you could guarantee an appeal. But as this is a kangaroo court judgment, no one actually cares.
Iran is going to tell you where to go and how to get there
Come on! The religion of peace wouldn’t do that.
The courts think iran is bad, but the government will not help trump with his war with them. Am I missing something?
If my spouse treats me like dirt, and i leave then get re-married, my new spouse should have the right to sue the ex spouse because they mistreated me?. Just trying to wrap my head around this
Here we go again, our courts and our government sticking ITS NOSE INTO SOMEONE ELSE’S BUSINESS and minding their own business at home. What RIGHT do our courts have, what power do they have to RULE what happens in Iran? None should be the answer.
Good luck with that!
I’m sure Iran will make good on the payout….ridiculous. How much money did our tax payers pay to have this judge come up with this ruling.
So why does an Ontario judge believe that Canadian laws have any jurisdiction in Iran? What a silly thing to do. Sure it feels good but it has no meaning. It has no more effect that in I claimed I was owed money from Trump for fouling up travel with his tariffs and wars.
We need to have judges who understand the law and how it works. Where do they get these guys?
BTW: all that Trump has to do to open the strait is to remove his blockade. Why the spin?
Seems good to me, import another 10 thousand… and ferry another couple bil to Ukraine